跳到正文
原文
Agent Control Flash News·· 3 小时前AI 评分40

AWS AgInt 框架:利用确定性 harness 收录分级证据,提升代码行为分析效率

软件 agent 别把证据留在自由文本:AWS AgInt 由确定性 harness 收录分级证据,GLM-5 reject-F1 0.256→0.543,单候选成本 −59%

Edge-TTS 广播级有声
全员无门槛畅听
点击合成广播级音频
00:00
00:00
AI 导读

代码行为问题答得准不准,取决于 harness 治理下的证据状态,而不是更长的推理。

正文

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Software agents answer behavioral questions about code, such as whether a patch passes tests or which lines caused a failure. These tasks require repository-wide evidence, yet most scaffolds leave intermediate findings in free-form trajectories, making them hard to reuse and easy to disconnect from final answers. We present Agentic Interpretation (AgInt), a framework for harness-governed evidence construction. The model proposes typed records, while a deterministic harness admits, grades, and persists them, reports unresolved requirements, and licenses answers under task-specific rules. The resulting certificate gives the model persistent external state and leaves an auditable decision record. Formally, append-only certificate states form a grounding lattice ordered by record inclusion, where each admitted record extends the state by union.
We evaluate AgInt with four models on SWE-bench-Live and DeepSWE for patch acceptance and Defects4J and GitBug-Java for fault localization. AgInt outperforms the plain agent and Agentic Code Reasoning on all reported patch-acceptance metrics and ranks responsible lines higher while inspecting fewer irrelevant lines in fault localization. For GLM-5, reject-class F1 rises from 0.256 to 0.543 on SWE-bench-Live, All@1 rises from 0.140 to 0.400 on Defects4J, and wasted inspected lines fall from 31.5 to 11.7 on GitBug-Java. A matched-template control separates the mechanism: the persistent scaffold drives most fault-localization gains, while the certificate body and gate govern patch-acceptance calibration. With execution licensed, AgInt produces harness-reproduced witnesses for 293 of 475 null-dereference candidates versus 253 for a matched shell agent, and 62 of 117 resource-leak candidates versus 58. Across reported efficiency measurements, it uses 35% fewer executions and reduces cost per candidate by 59%.
Comments: 22 pages, 5 figures, 4 tables
Subjects: Software Engineering (cs.SE); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2610.23996 [cs.SE]
  (or arXiv:2610.23996v1 [cs.SE] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.23996

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Yifeng He [view email]
[v1] Thu, 15 Oct 2026 05:42:04 UTC (112 KB)

来源:Agent Control Flash News · arxiv.org

💡量子基态深度拆解 · 关联专栏与产品
原创出品站长/Quantara 团队·约 3 分钟深度解析

Cursor Agent 架构全景拆解:从影子工作区到多文件推演引擎

全面剖析 Cursor 在 Agent 模式下的底层技术实现,解析影子分支隔离、LSP 上下文剪枝以及预测性补全的核心架构细节与工程实践经验。

深入理解底层架构与行业变量阅读完整拆解 →
精选收录Vercel Changelog·约 1 分钟深度解析

Vercel v0 推出全新多 Agent 协作画布与实时全栈部署预览

动态速评:v0 正在从单一组件生成器演进为全栈应用搭建协作台,尤其是与 Neon/Postgres 的直连极大降低了全栈原型验证成本。

深入理解底层架构与行业变量阅读完整拆解 →