跳到正文
原文
Agent Control Flash News·· 3 小时前精选AI 评分70

Harness 进化提升大型语言模型表现:Berkeley/Stanford 实验结果

Harness 进化有天花板:Berkeley/Stanford,4B held-out 0.16→0.30、交付 55%→90%

Edge-TTS 广播级有声
全员无门槛畅听
点击合成广播级音频
00:00
00:00
AI 导读

长程 agent 该先进化 harness 还是先训权重,可从失败构成读出。

推荐理由

该研究通过实验展示了如何通过进化智能体来提升大型语言模型的表现,为读者提供了关于智能体进化的新思路。

一手信源
学术论文·arXiv:2610.11655

Harness 进化提升大型语言模型表现 (arXiv:2610.11655)

Stanford University

“View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract: Improving a long-horizon LLM agent means evolving the harness around a frozen model or training its w”

正文 · 原文

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Improving a long-horizon LLM agent means evolving the harness around a frozen model or training its weights. We let a self-evolving harness make the system stronger first, then cross seed and evolved harnesses with base and trained weights to learn which gains the trained model keeps and which still need the runtime. We show that the right lever can be read off the agent's failure composition: labelling failed trajectories by the first signal that fires separates process failures (blocked calls, loops, exhausted step budgets) from content failures (a delivered plan that is poor). Harness evolution repairs the former, the behaviour it instils can be trained into the weights, and content failures are what weight training is for. On DeepPlanning, a self-evolving harness loop lifts the held-out score of Qwen3.5-4B from 0.16 to 0.30 and of Qwen3.5-9B from 0.32 to 0.44; for 4B, held-out delivery rises from 55% to 90% while content failures are left for the weights. LoRA adapters trained on evolved-harness trajectories internalise the gain: under the original harness they add +0.13 on held-out tasks for both sizes; on 4B they stack with the harness to more than double the held-out score, and on 9B the adapter alone matches the full evolution line, cutting content failures from a quarter of trajectories to one in twenty. A placebo adapter trained on answer-shuffled trajectories falls below the base model. The loop transfers to WebArena-Lite (+0.09 on 117 unseen tasks), where the gain lives in what the model sees and adapters do not add to it. The result is a diagnose-then-intervene rule applied twice: read the failure composition to choose between harness and weights, then read what the accepted edits changed to decide which gains to train in. Scores are four-rollout means against fresh anchors, same-night except where marked, across eight models from six families and two benchmarks.
Comments: 21 pages, 7 figures, 15 tables
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2610.11655 [cs.AI]
  (or arXiv:2610.11655v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.11655

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Yuan Tian [view email]
[v1] Thu, 8 Oct 2026 10:33:29 UTC (292 KB)

来源:Agent Control Flash News · arxiv.org